Each of these phases plays a vital role in a successful strategy. We will look at each of these phases in more detail in the section "Making an inclusion strategy".
^^ top ^^
On paper, strategy is a logical and linear process moving steadily from Analysis to Planning to Implementation and finally to Evaluation. In real life, however, strategy is actually much more cyclical.
In practice, there can be a lot of overlap between the different phases. For instance, you may have to start Implementing before you have totally completed your Planning. By the same token, you may be deep in the Implementation phase when circumstances change, forcing you to go back to make a new Plan and possibly even a new Analysis. Evaluation will take place at many points throughout the process, not just at the end.
Strategies are cyclical because the situation around us is always changing. No one can predict the future and having a strategy cannot prevent circumstances from affecting your organisation. Having a strategy does not mean that you are trying to control the future. It means that you are anticipating and preparing for whatever the future may bring.
The most effective strategies are those which can respond and adapt to changes as they arise. This means that a strategy should not be just another document gathering dust on the shelf. A strategy is something alive, something which moves and evolves as necessary.
Having said that, it is important to stress that strategy development must begin at the beginning. It is not logical (and certainly not effective) to start implementing action steps before you even know where you are starting from.
^^ top ^^
Despite the fact that many institutions have strategies (commercial companies as well as non-governmental organisations), you might not yet be completely sold on the idea. While this booklet is obviously very much in favour of strategy, there are advantages as well as disadvantages involved:
Some advantages to strategy | Some disadvantages to strategy |
---|---|
|
|
Many people feel that although the advantages of strategy are very attractive, the disadvantages outweigh any possible benefits. As a result, many people write off the idea of strategy-making without ever having given it a try.
It is interesting to note that the disadvantages listed above stem largely from our perception of strategy rather than from our own experience. If you have never tried to design or implement a strategy, how can you know if it takes time or costs money? And what, precisely, is this perceived loss of time and money measured against?
The disadvantages listed here are not actually disadvantages to strategy itself, but rather they describe problems which can arise when a strategy is not developed in the correct way. These perceived disadvantages are actually commonly held strategy myths. These myths are so powerful that they can strangle the strategy development process before it even gets started. Therefore it is important to understand where these and other strategy myths come from.
^^ top ^^